As Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is going into hiding over protection worries sparked through anti-vax protests, Congress MP Abhishek Manu Singhvi took a dig on the Liberal Party of Canada chief hoping that his ‘anti-India friends’ could come to his rescue. Taking to Twitter, Singhvi asserted that earlier than poking his nostril into the inner subjects of India, the Canadian PM have to have remembered that ‘karma’ had the capability to ‘hit returned hard’. His commentary got here in reaction to the unwarranted statements made through Trudeau in the course of India’s farmers’ protest in 2020.
The Canadian Prime Minister on Saturday left Ottawa alongside together along with his own circle of relatives to a ‘mystery location’ after protection worries sparked over intensifying anti-vaccine mandate protests withinside the capital city. The protests in assist of cross-border truckers started out on Saturday while Parliamentary Protective Service anticipated an amassment of almost 10,000 demonstrators in Ottawa. A convoy of truckers in opposition to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate descended to the city, sparking an coming near near violent flip of events.
Amidst the escalating tensions, Canadian Parliament’s Seargent-at-Arms suspected the demonstrators should display up at authentic homes. So far, the PM’s workplace has refused to touch upon the relocation of Trudeau, bringing up protection reasons.
Trudeau wades into farmers’ protest
In December 2020, Justin Trudeau expressed his unsolicited worries over the farmers’ protests in India declaring that his authorities had raised the problem through ‘a couple of means’ with Indian authorities. Calling the state of affairs as ‘concerning’, Trudeau remarked that Canada helps the ‘proper to non violent protests’.
The Ministry of External Affairs had sharply hit returned at Canada’s interference withinside the inner subjects of India saying, “We’ve visible a few ill-knowledgeable feedback through Canadian leaders referring to farmers in India. These are unwarranted specifically while relating the inner affairs of a democratic country. It’s additionally great that diplomatic conversations are not misrepresented for political purposes.”